Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we’ll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Lactoferrin vs Zinc: Zinc has the stronger overall evidence (8.5 vs 6.3/10); they're alternatives for support immune system — the best pick depends on your goals. Take the 60-second quiz for a pick tailored to your goals.
Zinc wins 3 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Too few graded studies
1 of 1 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Likely helps
13 of 15 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (2)
Outcomes where both Lactoferrin and Zinc have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
200–300 mg daily for adults; 100–200 mg/day for children (a typical label dose, not the dose used in the cited trials, which used 600 to 3,400 mg a day in adults, and no cited trial states a dose for children)
30–60 minutes before breakfast, Between meals on an empty stomach
Bovine lactoferrin capsule or powder (≥95% purity)
15-25mg daily (a typical label dose, not the dose used in the cited trials, which used about 30 mg a day)
With meals
Zinc picolinate or zinc citrate
and 4 more not shown
4–8 weeks of use
4–8 weeks
4–8 weeks
6–12 weeks
2-4 weeks
2-4 weeks
4-8 weeks
Immediate
Effect of Lactoferrin Supplementation on Inflammation, Immune Function, and Prevention of Respiratory Tract Infections in Humans: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Advances in Nutrition (2022) · Meta analysis
Lactoferrin significantly reduced IL-6 in adults (mean difference: -24.9 pg/mL; 95% CI: -41.64, -8.08 pg/mL)
Lactoferrin reduces the risk of respiratory tract infections: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN (2021) · Meta analysis · n=1194
Pooled analysis of RCTs showed significant reduction in respiratory tract infection risk with lactoferrin supplementation
Comparative Effects between Oral Lactoferrin and Ferrous Sulfate Supplementation on Iron-Deficiency Anemia: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.
Nutrients (2022) · Meta analysis
Lactoferrin supplementation had better effects on serum iron (WMD: 41.44 ug/dL; p < 0.00001), ferritin (WMD: 13.60 ng/mL; p = 0.003) and hemoglobin concentration (11.80 g/dL; p < 0.00001), but a reducing effect on fractional iron absorption (WMD: −2.08%; p = 0.02) and IL-6 levels (WMD: −45.59 pg/mL; p < 0.00001) compared with ferrous sulfate.
Efficacy of Zinc Supplementation in the Management of Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients (2024) · Meta analysis · n=739
Zinc supplementation significantly reduced pain severity compared to placebo (Hedges's g = -1.541; 95% CI: -2.268 to -0.814; p < 0.001), representing a clinically meaningful reduction in pain.
Effects of Daily Zinc Alone or in Combination with Other Nutrient Supplements on the Risk of Malaria Parasitaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
Nutrients (2023) · Meta analysis · n=1339
The effect sizes, represented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were standardised by transforming them into log RRs and then pooling them using a fixed-effects or random-effects model depending on the heterogeneity across studies.
Prevalence of Zinc Deficiency in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients (2022) · Meta analysis · n=806
Pooled analyses by the IBD subgroup showed a total population of 1677 with CD, for an overall mean zinc deficiency prevalence of 54% and 95% confidence intervals (CI) ranging from 0.51 to 0.56, versus 41% (95%CI 0.38-0.45) in the UC population (n = 806).
Zinc has a higher evidence score (8.5/10 vs 6.3/10) and wins in 3 of 3 categories.
For support immune system, Lactoferrin has a higher relevance score (92 vs 90).
No documented interaction was found in the data searched. This does not establish that this exact combination is safe.
AREDS2 works for diagnosed AMD; lutein/screen-strain claims are weaker. Who actually benefits.
The popular one (saw palmetto) mostly fails in rigorous trials; beta-sitosterol is the better bet.
Selenium helps; iodine can WORSEN Hashimoto’s. The honest take on "thyroid support".
CoQ10, zinc, selenium, carnitine modestly help sperm parameters — but live-birth evidence is weak.
The right pick depends on your goals. Answer a few quick questions for a personalised recommendation — or dig into the full evidence on each.