Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we’ll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
B. lactis (BB-12 / HN019) vs L. acidophilus: B. lactis (BB-12 / HN019) has the stronger overall evidence (6 vs 5/10); they're alternatives for improve digestion — the best pick depends on your goals. Take the 60-second quiz for a pick tailored to your goals.
B. lactis (BB-12 / HN019) wins 2 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Too few graded studies
Top outcomes
Verdict
Too few graded studies
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both B. lactis (BB-12 / HN019) and L. acidophilus have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
1-10 billion CFU daily for BB-12 (1 billion is enough); 10-20 billion CFU daily for HN019 if transit is the goal
Any time of day
Capsule or sachet standardized to a named strain (BB-12 or HN019)
1-100 billion CFU (10^9 to 10^11) per serving — the range FDA reviewed without objection for L. acidophilus DDS-1 in foods generally (GRAS Notice GRN 871); La-14 was noticed at 1 billion CFU per 250 g serving (GRN 502) (the one cited trial that states a dose used 10 billion CFU a day)
Any time of day
A product naming its strain (e.g. NCFM, DDS-1, La-14, La-5)
2 weeks
4 weeks
n/a
n/a
Weeks
Weeks
Course of antibiotics
Dose-response effect of Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 on whole gut transit time and functional gastrointestinal symptoms in adults.
Scand J Gastroenterol (2011) · Rct · n=100
Whole-gut transit fell 49 to 21 hours on high dose (p<0.001) and 60 to 41 hours on low dose (p=0.01); placebo unchanged
Eight-Week Supplementation With Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 and Functional Constipation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Netw Open (2024) · Rct · n=229
Primary outcome (change in complete spontaneous bowel movements per week): +0.80 with HN019 vs +0.66 placebo — no difference
Effects of 28-day Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019 supplementation on colonic transit time and gastrointestinal symptoms in adults with functional constipation: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, and dose-ranging trial.
Gut Microbes (2018) · Rct · n=228
No significant differences vs placebo in the primary outcome (colonic transit time) or any secondary outcome
Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1 and Bifidobacterium lactis UABla-12 Improve Abdominal Pain Severity and Symptomology in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Nutrients (2020) · Rct · n=330
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial in 330 adults with IBS (Rome IV), allocated 1:1:1 to placebo, L. acidophilus DDS-1 alone or B. lactis UABla-12 alone, each at 1 × 10^10 CFU/day for six weeks
The effects of the DDS-1 strain of lactobacillus on symptomatic relief for lactose intolerance - a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical trial.
Nutr J (2016) · Crossover
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in adults with self-reported lactose intolerance confirmed by a lactose challenge: 4 weeks of DDS-1 or maltodextrin placebo once daily, with a 2-week washout
Lactobacilli and bifidobacteria in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and Clostridium difficile diarrhoea in older inpatients (PLACIDE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial.
Lancet (2013) · Rct · n=2981
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial in 2,981 inpatients aged 65 and over taking antibiotics, given a multistrain preparation of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria (6 × 10^10 organisms per day for 21 days) or placebo
B. lactis (BB-12 / HN019) has a higher evidence score (6/10 vs 5/10) and wins in 2 of 3 categories.
For improve digestion, B. lactis (BB-12 / HN019) has a higher relevance score (68 vs 55).
No documented interaction was found in the data searched. This does not establish that this exact combination is safe.
The right pick depends on your goals. Answer a few quick questions for a personalised recommendation — or dig into the full evidence on each.