We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we’ll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Dulaglutide vs Semaglutide: Semaglutide has the stronger overall evidence (8.5 vs 7/10); they're alternatives for manage weight — the best pick depends on your goals. Take the 60-second quiz for a pick tailored to your goals.
Semaglutide wins 2 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Too few graded studies
Top outcomes
Verdict
Too few graded studies
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (3)
Outcomes where both Dulaglutide and Semaglutide have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
Prescription-only, clinician-prescribed. Subcutaneous 0.75 mg once weekly to start, usually escalated to 1.5 mg; 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg once-weekly doses are available for additional glycemic lowering. DO NOT self-dose.
Any time of day
Subcutaneous once-weekly pen (Trulicity)
Prescription-only, clinician-titrated. Subcutaneous (Wegovy weight management: escalate to 2.4 mg once weekly; Ozempic diabetes: 0.5-2.0 mg once weekly). Oral (Rybelsus diabetes: 3-14 mg once daily). DO NOT self-dose.
Any time of day
Subcutaneous once-weekly injection (Ozempic / Wegovy)
Weeks to months
Months to years
Months
Especially during initiation/escalation
Weeks to months
Months (titrated over 16-20 weeks)
Months to years
Especially during dose escalation
Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Lancet (2019) · Rct · n=9901
Multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled cardiovascular-outcomes RCT: 9,901 patients aged ≥50 with type 2 diabetes, randomized to subcutaneous dulaglutide 1.5 mg/week or placebo at 371 sites in 24 countries
Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2019) · Meta analysis
Meta-analysis of seven GLP-1 receptor agonist cardiovascular-outcomes trials (ELIXA, LEADER, SUSTAIN-6, EXSCEL, Harmony Outcomes, REWIND, PIONEER 6); 56,004 participants
Dulaglutide and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an exploratory analysis of the REWIND randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Lancet (2019) · Rct · n=9901
Pre-specified exploratory analysis of the REWIND trial (9,901 participants) examining the renal component of the composite microvascular outcome
Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity (STEP 1).
N Engl J Med (2021) · Rct · n=1961
Double-blind RCT in 1,961 adults with obesity/overweight WITHOUT diabetes, randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg/week or placebo plus lifestyle for 68 weeks
Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes (SELECT).
N Engl J Med (2023) · Rct · n=17604
Large cardiovascular-outcomes RCT: 17,604 patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease and overweight/obesity but WITHOUT diabetes
Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN-6).
N Engl J Med (2016) · Rct · n=3297
Pre-approval cardiovascular-safety RCT in 3,297 patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk, semaglutide (0.5/1.0 mg/week) vs placebo for 104 weeks
Semaglutide has a higher evidence score (8.5/10 vs 7/10) and wins in 2 of 3 categories.
For manage weight, Semaglutide has a higher relevance score (88 vs 52).
No documented interaction was found in the data searched. This does not establish that this exact combination is safe.
The right pick depends on your goals. Answer a few quick questions for a personalised recommendation — or dig into the full evidence on each.