Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we’ll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Folic Acid vs Zinc: Zinc has the stronger overall evidence (8.5 vs 8/10); they're alternatives for prenatal support — the best pick depends on your goals. Take the 60-second quiz for a pick tailored to your goals.
Zinc wins 3 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Too few graded studies
Top outcomes
Verdict
Likely helps
13 of 15 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both Folic Acid and Zinc have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
400 mcg/day for anyone planning or capable of pregnancy (USPSTF: 400-800 mcg); adult RDA 400 mcg DFE/day, 600 mcg DFE in pregnancy, 500 mcg DFE in lactation (IOM)
Any time of day
Folic acid (pteroylmonoglutamic acid)
15-25mg daily (a typical label dose, not the dose used in the cited trials, which used about 30 mg a day)
With meals
Zinc picolinate or zinc citrate
and 4 more not shown
Periconceptional
Weeks
Weeks to months
2-4 weeks
2-4 weeks
4-8 weeks
Immediate
Prevention of the first occurrence of neural-tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation.
N Engl J Med (1992) · Rct
Randomised trial of periconceptional vitamin supplementation for prevention of a FIRST neural tube defect (PubMed publication types: Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical Trial)
Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group.
Lancet (1991) · Rct
Randomised, multicentre trial of periconceptional folic acid for prevention of RECURRENT neural tube defects (PubMed publication types: Randomized Controlled Trial, Multicenter Study, Comparative Study)
Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2015) · Meta analysis
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews CD007950, third edition (PubMed publication types: Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review)
Efficacy of Zinc Supplementation in the Management of Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients (2024) · Meta analysis · n=739
Zinc supplementation significantly reduced pain severity compared to placebo (Hedges's g = -1.541; 95% CI: -2.268 to -0.814; p < 0.001), representing a clinically meaningful reduction in pain.
Effects of Daily Zinc Alone or in Combination with Other Nutrient Supplements on the Risk of Malaria Parasitaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
Nutrients (2023) · Meta analysis · n=1339
The effect sizes, represented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were standardised by transforming them into log RRs and then pooling them using a fixed-effects or random-effects model depending on the heterogeneity across studies.
Prevalence of Zinc Deficiency in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients (2022) · Meta analysis · n=806
Pooled analyses by the IBD subgroup showed a total population of 1677 with CD, for an overall mean zinc deficiency prevalence of 54% and 95% confidence intervals (CI) ranging from 0.51 to 0.56, versus 41% (95%CI 0.38-0.45) in the UC population (n = 806).
Zinc has a higher evidence score (8.5/10 vs 8/10) and wins in 3 of 3 categories.
For prenatal support, Folic Acid has a higher relevance score (95 vs 60).
No documented interaction was found in the data searched. This does not establish that this exact combination is safe.
Folate is essential; inositol + CoQ10 are the best bets — but conception evidence is limited.
Commonly recommended vs ask-your-clinician vs avoid — a general, safety-first overview.
AREDS2 works for diagnosed AMD; lutein/screen-strain claims are weaker. Who actually benefits.
The popular one (saw palmetto) mostly fails in rigorous trials; beta-sitosterol is the better bet.
The right pick depends on your goals. Answer a few quick questions for a personalised recommendation — or dig into the full evidence on each.