Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Probiotics wins 2 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Likely helps
30 of 39 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Likely helps
3 of 3 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both Probiotics and Pygeum have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
10-20 billion CFU
With or without food (strain-dependent), Same time daily for consistency
Capsules with multiple strains
100-200mg standardized extract daily
Once or twice daily, With or without food
Standardized extract (13-14% sterols)
2-4 weeks
4-8 weeks
4-8 weeks
First 1-2 weeks
6-8 weeks
6-8 weeks
8-12 weeks
Preventive Effect of Probiotics on Oral Mucositis Induced by Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
International journal of molecular sciences (2022) · Meta analysis · n=708
Three trials using Lactobacilli-based probiotics reported that the incidence of oral mucositis in the probiotic group was significantly low (risk ratio [RR] = 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.77−0.93, p = 0.0004).
Probiotics for treating acute infectious diarrhoea
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2020) · Meta analysis · n=12127
Effect size was similar in the sensitivity analysis and marked heterogeneity persisted.
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults and children
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2017) · Meta analysis · n=9955
A complete case analysis (i.e. participants who completed the study) among trials investigating CDAD (31 trials, 8672 participants) suggests that probiotics reduce the risk of CDAD by 60%.
What do we know about phytotherapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia?
Life sciences (2015) · Systematic review
On the basis of preclinical studies several mechanisms of action have been postulated, including 5alpha-reductase inhibition, alpha-adrenergic antagonism, dihydrotestosterone and estrogen receptor inhibition.
Phytotherapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia. A minireview
Phytotherapy research : PTR (2014) · Systematic review
Histological BPH, which typically develops after the age of 40 years, ranges in prevalence from >50% at 60 years to as high as 90% by 85 years of age.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia and male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)
BMJ clinical evidence (2011) · Systematic review
We found 63 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria.
Based on meta-analyses showing benefits for IBS and digestive symptoms. Effect sizes varied considerably between studies with low to very low certainty of evidence. Initial GI symptoms common when starting but typically resolve within 1-2 weeks.
Based on Cochrane review (n=1562) and network meta-analysis showing modest benefits. Evidence quality noted as low-to-moderate due to dated methodology in available RCTs. Most studies used standardized bark extract.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
Probiotics has a higher evidence score (9/10 vs 5.5/10) and wins in 2 of 3 categories.
For reduce inflammation, Probiotics has a higher relevance score (95 vs 50).
No known interactions between Probiotics and Pygeum have been documented in our database. However, always consult a healthcare provider before combining supplements.