We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we’ll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Studies
Ava3.6
Avanafil (Stendra) Research
Mostly mechanism / observational
28 peer-reviewed studies
What the evidence says
Mostly mechanism / observational
Most Avanafil (Stendra) studies are mechanism or observational rather than RCTs that measure a clinical effect — keep findings provisional.
Most evidence is from high-quality meta-analyses and randomised trials published 2010–2023.
Based on 28 studies · 11 meta-analyses · 13 RCTs
Confidence
High confidence
By outcome
Erectile functionPhase-3 RCT and meta-analytic evidence for clinically meaningful improvement in erectile function versus placebo, including in men with diabetes; often effective within ~15-30 minutes · ~15-30 minutes (on-demand)
Mostly mechanism / observational22 studies
Cardiovascular & vascular
Too few graded studies1 study
Steady research
7 studies in the last 5 years · Latest meta-analysis: 2021
201020162023
1Meta-Analysis2019
Li J, Peng L, Cao D, He L, Li Y, Wei Q · Am J Mens Health (2019)