1 RCT 2012
Avanafil significantly improved erectile function and was well tolerated across doses in men with erectile dysfunction.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of the safety and efficacy of avanafil in subjects with erectile dysfunction. Goldstein, McCullough, Jones, Hellstrom, Bowden, Didonato, Trask, Day · The Journal of Sexual Medicine (2012)
REVIVE: 12-week phase-3 double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT of on-demand avanafil (50, 100, 200 mg) in men with erectile dysfunction Significant improvement on the IIEF erectile-function domain and per-attempt success versus placebo Onset was rapid and the drug was well tolerated; common effects were headache, flushing, and nasal congestion 2 RCT 2012
Avanafil significantly improved erectile function in men with diabetes mellitus and was generally well tolerated.
Avanafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study in men with diabetes mellitus. Goldstein, Jones, Belkoff, Karlin, Bowden, Peterson, Trask, Day · Mayo Clinic Proceedings (2012)
REVIVE-Diabetes: 12-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind RCT of avanafil in men with ED and diabetes mellitus Significant improvement on the IIEF and per-attempt intercourse success versus placebo in a hard-to-treat population Demonstrates efficacy in diabetic erectile dysfunction, where vascular and neuropathic disease blunt response 3 Meta-Analysis 2014
Avanafil meaningfully improved erectile function versus placebo with a favorable tolerability profile.
Avanafil for male erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cui, Li, Zong, Yan, Zhang · Asian Journal of Andrology (2014)
Systematic review and meta-analysis pooling randomized placebo-controlled avanafil trials Avanafil improved IIEF and successful-intercourse rates versus placebo across doses Tolerability was favorable, with headache and flushing the most common adverse effects 4 Systematic Review 2017
PDE5-inhibitor administration improved erectile-function recovery after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
Erectile function recovery in men treated with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor administration after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of placebo-controlled randomized trials with trial sequential analysis. Limoncin, Gravina, Corona, Maggi, Ciocca, Lenzi, Jannini · Andrology (2017)
Systematic review with trial sequential analysis of placebo-controlled RCTs of PDE5 inhibitors (the avanafil class) after radical prostatectomy PDE5-inhibitor treatment improved erectile-function recovery versus placebo in nerve-sparing surgery Supports the role of the PDE5-inhibitor class in a major post-surgical ED population 5 Open-Label 2013
Over 52 weeks, avanafil maintained efficacy with a favorable safety and tolerability profile.
An open-label, long-term evaluation of the safety, efficacy and tolerability of avanafil in male patients with mild to severe erectile dysfunction. Belkoff, McCullough, Goldstein, Jones, Bowden, DiDonato, Trask, Day · International Journal of Clinical Practice (2013)
52-week open-label extension of two 12-week phase-3 placebo-controlled trials Sustained improvement in erectile function and successful-intercourse rates over a year of use Confirms long-term tolerability of a rapidly absorbed, highly selective PDE5 inhibitor 6 Preclinical 2014
Avanafil is a potent and highly selective PDE5 inhibitor (a pyrimidine-5-carboxamide derivative) with high selectivity over the other phosphodiesterase isozymes.
The discovery of avanafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a novel pyrimidine-5-carboxamide derivative as a potent and highly selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor. Sakamoto, Koga, Hikota, Matsuki, Murakami, Kikkawa, Fujishige, Kotera, Omori, Morimoto, Yamada · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters (2014)
Medicinal-chemistry account of the discovery of avanafil as a pyrimidine-5-carboxamide PDE5 inhibitor Characterizes high PDE5 potency with high selectivity over PDE6 (retinal) and PDE1 Provides the mechanistic basis for fast onset and a potentially lower visual-side-effect profile than sildenafil