Wang H, Zhang X, Wu W, Zhang M, Sam NB, Niu L · Medicine (Baltimore) (2018)
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we’ll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
8 peer-reviewed studies
What the evidence says
Most D-Aspartic Acid studies are mechanism or observational rather than RCTs that measure a clinical effect — keep findings provisional.
Most evidence is from high-quality meta-analyses and randomised trials published 2013–2025.
Based on 8 studies · 1 meta-analysis · 6 RCTs
Confidence
Moderate confidenceBy outcome
3 studies in the last 5 years · Latest meta-analysis: 2018
Wang H, Zhang X, Wu W, Zhang M, Sam NB, Niu L · Medicine (Baltimore) (2018)
Crewther B, Witek K, Draga P, Zmijewski P, Obmiński Z · Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab (2019)
Płoszczyca K, Czuba M, Zakrzeska A, Gajda R · Nutrients (2023)
Willoughby DS, Leutholtz B · Nutr Res (2013)
Melville GW, Siegler JC, Marshall PWM · PLoS One (2017)
In plain English: A 2025 randomized trial of a D-aspartic acid + ubiquinol + zinc combination in infertile men found increased total testosterone and sperm motility — but the effect cannot be isolated to DAA.
GamalEl Din SF et al. · Arch Ital Urol Androl (2025)
In plain English: A trial of 3g and 6g D-aspartic acid in resistance-trained men found no benefit — and the higher dose tended to LOWER testosterone.
Melville GW et al. · J Int Soc Sports Nutr (2015)
In plain English: A systematic review of 'testosterone boosters' found D-aspartic acid did not reliably increase serum total testosterone.
Morgado, Tsampoukas, Sokolakis, Schoentgen, Urkmez, Sarikaya · International journal of impotence research (2024)