We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we’ll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies

Hdi2.0

Hoodia Research

Mostly mechanism / observational

4 peer-reviewed studies

What the evidence says

Mostly mechanism / observational

Most Hoodia studies are mechanism or observational rather than RCTs that measure a clinical effect — keep findings provisional.

Most evidence is from high-quality randomised trials published 2011–2020 with a typical study size of 60 participants.

Based on 4 studies · 3 RCTs · 109 total participants

Confidence

Moderate confidence

By outcome

Weight managementThe one rigorous human RCT found NO effect on appetite or body weight versus placebo, with more adverse effects — no credible evidence of benefit · No demonstrated effect
Mostly mechanism / observational4 studies

Older research base

Newest study from 2020

20112020

1RCT2020

Perna S, Infantino V, Peroni G, Gasparri C, Faliva MA, Naso M · Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol (2020)

View source

2RCTn=49 · small study2011

In plain English: The most rigorous human trial found Hoodia extract had no significant effect on energy intake or body weight versus placebo, and was less well tolerated with adverse changes in vital signs and laboratory parameters.

Blom WA et al. · Am J Clin Nutr (2011)

Randomized, placebo-controlled trial: 1110mg purified extract twice daily for 15 days in overweight women (HgPE n=25, placebo n=24)
NO significant difference in ad libitum energy intake or body weight versus placebo
Significant increases in blood pressure, pulse, heart rate, bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase in the Hoodia group

View source

3RCTn=60 · small study2016

In plain English: A follow-up to the Hoodia trial found that two weeks of a bitter tastant mixture (the kind used to flavour-match Hoodia) did not significantly affect energy intake either.

Peters HPF et al. · Appetite (2016)

Randomized, double-blind trial in 60 overweight women testing sustained bitter-tastant exposure
No significant effect on total energy intake versus non-bitter placebo (mean difference -109 kcal, P=0.13)
Body weight changes were negligible

View source

4Review2011

In plain English: A comprehensive review concluded that scientific data on Hoodia's clinical efficacy and especially safety are insufficient or completely absent, despite its heavy commercial use.

Vermaak I, Hamman JH, Viljoen AM · Planta Med (2011)

Traditional San use as a hunger/thirst suppressant; P57 proposed as the active glycoside
Publications on in-vivo biopharmaceutics, clinical efficacy, and especially safety are insufficient or absent
Widespread product adulteration is a major quality-control concern

View source

View in Research Library

Hoodia Research

Mostly mechanism / observational

Effects of Hoodia Parviflora on satiety, abdominal obesity and weight in a group of overweight subjects: a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

Effects of 15-d repeated consumption of Hoodia gordonii purified extract on safety, ad libitum energy intake, and body weight in healthy, overweight women: a randomized controlled trial.

The effect of two weeks ingestion of a bitter tastant mixture on energy intake in overweight females.

Hoodia gordonii: an up-to-date review of a commercially important anti-obesity plant.