We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Most Synephrine studies are mechanism or observational rather than RCTs that measure a clinical effect — keep findings provisional.
Most evidence is from high-quality meta-analyses and randomised trials published 2004–2022.
Based on 12 studies · 2 meta-analyses · 6 RCTs
Confidence
High
By outcome
Weight managementSmall increase in fat oxidation/metabolic rate; clinical weight loss is unproven · 4-12 weeks
Mostly mechanism / observational3 studies
Safety profile
Too few graded studies1 study
Steady research
3 studies in the last 5 years · Latest meta-analysis: 2022
200420132022
1Meta-Analysis2022
A meta-analysis of Citrus aurantium (bitter orange) / p-synephrine found small metabolic effects and concluded it modestly raises metabolic rate without large blood-pressure changes at typical doses, while urging caution with stimulant combinations.
Koncz D et al. · Nutrients (2022)
Modest increase in metabolic rate / energy expenditure
No large blood-pressure change at typical low doses
Caution advised when combined with caffeine/stimulants
An early meta-analysis on citrus aurantium for weight loss found insufficient evidence of meaningful efficacy and flagged cardiovascular safety questions.
Bent S et al. · The American journal of cardiology (2004)
Insufficient evidence for clinically meaningful weight loss
Cardiovascular safety concerns raised
Often combined with caffeine/other stimulants in products
An evidence-based systematic review of bitter orange summarized modest thermogenic effects and a generally tolerable profile at low p-synephrine doses.
Ulbricht C et al. · Journal of dietary supplements (2013)