Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we’ll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
B. coagulans vs L. rhamnosus GG: L. rhamnosus GG has the stronger overall evidence (6 vs 5/10); they're alternatives for improve digestion — the best pick depends on your goals. Take the 60-second quiz for a pick tailored to your goals.
L. rhamnosus GG wins 2 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Too few graded studies
Top outcomes
Verdict
Mostly mechanism / observational
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both B. coagulans and L. rhamnosus GG have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
1-2 billion CFU (spores) daily. The IBS-D and gas/bloating trials used 2 x 10^9 CFU/day of MTCC 5856 (LactoSpore); the GBI-30 6086 (BC30) studies used 1 x 10^9 CFU/day.
Any time of day
Tablet or capsule delivering a named strain — MTCC 5856 (LactoSpore) for IBS, GBI-30 6086 (BC30) for the exercise and amino-acid claims
10-20 billion CFU (1-2 x 10^10) daily. A meta-analysis in children with acute gastroenteritis found LGG effective at 10 billion CFU/day or more, and borderline below that.
Any time of day
Capsule standardized to ATCC 53103
4-12 weeks
4 weeks
n/a
n/a
During the antibiotic course
During hospital stay
n/a
n/a
Outcome-Specific Efficacy of Different Probiotic Strains and Mixtures in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Nutrients (2023) · Meta analysis
B. coagulans MTCC 5856 (SUCRA 96.9%) and B. coagulans Unique IS2 (SUCRA 92.6%) were among the most effective probiotics for improving abdominal pain
Probiotics and synbiotics in chronic constipation in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clin Nutr (2022) · Meta analysis
Probiotics increased stool frequency overall (SMD 0.71, 95% CI 0.37-1.04, P<0.00001), with Bifidobacterium lactis driving the effect
The effects of Bacillus coagulans MTCC 5856 on functional gas and bloating in adults: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Medicine (Baltimore) (2023) · Rct · n=70
GSRS indigestion score fell from 8.91 to 3.06 in the probiotic group versus 9.42 to 8.43 on placebo; between-group P<0.001
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG versus Placebo for Acute Gastroenteritis in Children.
N Engl J Med (2018) · Rct · n=971
Primary outcome (modified Vesikari score >=9 within 14 days): 11.8% with LGG vs 12.6% placebo; RR 0.96 (0.68-1.35), P=0.83
Systematic review with meta-analysis: Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in children and adults.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther (2015) · Meta analysis
Antibiotic-associated diarrhea fell from 22.4% to 12.3%; RR 0.49 (0.29-0.83) pooled across 11 RCTs, n=1,308 (12 RCTs, n=1,499 included overall)
Probiotics for treating acute infectious diarrhoea.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2020) · Meta analysis
In studies at low risk of bias, no difference in diarrhea lasting >=48 hours (RR 1.00, 0.91-1.09; moderate certainty)
L. rhamnosus GG has a higher evidence score (6/10 vs 5/10) and wins in 2 of 3 categories.
For improve digestion, L. rhamnosus GG has a higher relevance score (72 vs 58).
No documented interaction was found in the data searched. This does not establish that this exact combination is safe.
The right pick depends on your goals. Answer a few quick questions for a personalised recommendation — or dig into the full evidence on each.