Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we’ll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Creatine vs Pea Protein: Creatine has the stronger overall evidence (9.5 vs 5.5/10); they're alternatives for build strength & muscle — the best pick depends on your goals. Take the 60-second quiz for a pick tailored to your goals.
Creatine wins 2 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Likely helps
8 of 10 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Too few graded studies
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both Creatine and Pea Protein have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
5g daily
Any time, Post-workout may have slight advantage
Monohydrate powder
20-25 g per serving (aim for about 2-3 g leucine, and about 0.7-1 g protein per lb bodyweight in total daily). The one cited trial that states a dose used 25 g a day. Label servings go up to 40 g, above that dose.
Any time of day
Pea protein isolate (often blended with rice protein)
2-4 weeks
1-2 weeks
First week
2-4 weeks
4-12 weeks
Acute-days
Acute
Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Females Taking Oral Creatine Monohydrate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients (2020) · Meta analysis · n=951
Six hundred and fifty-six studies were identified where creatine supplementation was the primary intervention; fifty-eight were female only studies (9%).
International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (2017) · Systematic review
Increases strength by 5-15%
Effects of Creatine Supplementation and Resistance Training on Muscle Strength Gains in Adults <50 Years of Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients (2024) · Meta analysis · n=509
In comparison with a placebo, creatine supplementation combined with resistance training significantly increased upper-body (WMD = 4.43 kg, p < 0.001) and lower-body strength (WMD = 11.35 kg, p < 0.001).
Effects of Whey and Pea Protein Supplementation on Post-Eccentric Exercise Muscle Damage: A Randomized Trial.
Nutrients (2020) · Rct · n=92
92 non-athletic men aged 18 to 55 took pea protein, whey protein (0.9 g/kg/day) or water for 5 days after a 90-minute muscle-damaging exercise bout, double-blind for the two proteins.
Resistance training increases myofibrillar protein synthesis in middle-to-older aged adults consuming a typical diet with no influence of protein source: a randomized controlled trial.
The American journal of clinical nutrition (2025) · Rct · n=27
27 adults aged 50 to 70 ate 1.0 g/kg/day of protein for 10 days from a whey-supplemented or a pea-supplemented diet, training one leg every other day.
Real ileal amino acid digestibility of pea protein compared to casein in healthy humans: a randomized trial.
The American journal of clinical nutrition (2022) · Rct · n=15
15 healthy volunteers with a naso-ileal tube ate pea protein or casein in a randomised single-blind trial.
The 5 g point is a crossover trial in 123 adults taking 5 g a day for 6 weeks (PMID 37968687): the effect on backward digit span only bordered significance (p = 0.064), reasoning (Raven's matrices) did not change, and side effects were 4.25 times more common than on placebo. The 20 g point is a one-week trial of 5 g four times a day in 32 older adults, where most memory tasks improved (PMID 17828627). A meta-analysis of 10 trials found a small memory benefit (SMD 0.29), mostly in adults aged 66 to 76, with no effect of dose across 2.2 to 20 g a day (PMID 35984306), so the curve is flat. The two trials differ in age and length as well as dose. No minimum or optimal dose is established.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
Creatine has a higher evidence score (9.5/10 vs 5.5/10) and wins in 2 of 3 categories.
For build strength & muscle, Creatine has a higher relevance score (98 vs 40).
No documented interaction was found in the data searched. This does not establish that this exact combination is safe.
The honest tier list — proven staples vs situational vs mostly marketing. The hub the other guides feed into.
The most evidence-backed supplement there is — dose, forms, the beyond-muscle case, and the myths.
On Ozempic/Wegovy/Mounjaro? What actually helps — muscle preservation, GI relief, nutrient gaps (no upsell).
Tired? Why most "energy" pills only work if they fix a deficit — and how to find yours first.
The right pick depends on your goals. Answer a few quick questions for a personalised recommendation — or dig into the full evidence on each.