Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we’ll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Creatine vs Urolithin A: Creatine has the stronger overall evidence (9.5 vs 6/10); they're alternatives for athletic performance — the best pick depends on your goals. Take the 60-second quiz for a pick tailored to your goals.
Creatine wins 2 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Likely helps
8 of 10 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Too few graded studies
1 of 1 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both Creatine and Urolithin A have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
5g daily
Any time, Post-workout may have slight advantage
Monohydrate powder
500-1000mg
Morning with food
Mitopure (highly pure, bioavailable form)
2-4 weeks
1-2 weeks
First week
2-4 weeks
4-8 weeks
8-16 weeks
8-16 weeks
Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Females Taking Oral Creatine Monohydrate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients (2020) · Meta analysis · n=951
Six hundred and fifty-six studies were identified where creatine supplementation was the primary intervention; fifty-eight were female only studies (9%).
International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (2017) · Systematic review
Increases strength by 5-15%
Effects of Creatine Supplementation and Resistance Training on Muscle Strength Gains in Adults <50 Years of Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients (2024) · Meta analysis · n=509
In comparison with a placebo, creatine supplementation combined with resistance training significantly increased upper-body (WMD = 4.43 kg, p < 0.001) and lower-body strength (WMD = 11.35 kg, p < 0.001).
The effect of a high-polyphenol Mediterranean diet (Green-MED) combined with physical activity on age-related brain atrophy: the Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial Polyphenols Unprocessed Study (DIRECT PLUS)
The American journal of clinical nutrition (2022) · Rct · n=284
Among 284 participants (88% men; mean age: 51 y; BMI: 31.2 kg/m2; APOE-ε4 genotype = 15.7%), 224 (79%) completed the trial with eligible whole-brain MRIs.
Urolithin A induces mitophagy and prolongs lifespan
Nature Medicine (2016) · Preclinical
Extended lifespan in animal models
Effect of the mitophagy inducer urolithin A on age-related immune decline: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Nature aging (2025) · Rct · n=50
Exploratory single-cell RNA sequencing demonstrated UA-driven transcriptional shifts across immune populations, modulating pathways linked to inflammation and metabolism.
The 5 g point is a crossover trial in 123 adults taking 5 g a day for 6 weeks (PMID 37968687): the effect on backward digit span only bordered significance (p = 0.064), reasoning (Raven's matrices) did not change, and side effects were 4.25 times more common than on placebo. The 20 g point is a one-week trial of 5 g four times a day in 32 older adults, where most memory tasks improved (PMID 17828627). A meta-analysis of 10 trials found a small memory benefit (SMD 0.29), mostly in adults aged 66 to 76, with no effect of dose across 2.2 to 20 g a day (PMID 35984306), so the curve is flat. The two trials differ in age and length as well as dose. No minimum or optimal dose is established.
Both doses come from the first-in-human trial in healthy sedentary older adults (PMID 32694802), where 4 weeks of 500 mg or 1,000 mg modulated plasma acylcarnitines and muscle mitochondrial gene expression, with a favourable safety profile at every dose tested. The abstract does not rank the two doses, so the curve is flat. A 4-month trial of 1,000 mg in 66 adults aged 65 to 90 (PMID 35050355) also lowered acylcarnitines and C-reactive protein, but found no gain in maximal ATP production, a direct measure of mitochondrial function. These are biomarkers, not clinical outcomes, and no dose above 1,000 mg was tested.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
Creatine has a higher evidence score (9.5/10 vs 6/10) and wins in 2 of 3 categories.
For athletic performance, Creatine has a higher relevance score (90 vs 65).
No documented interaction was found in the data searched. This does not establish that this exact combination is safe.
The honest tier list — proven staples vs situational vs mostly marketing. The hub the other guides feed into.
The most evidence-backed supplement there is — dose, forms, the beyond-muscle case, and the myths.
On Ozempic/Wegovy/Mounjaro? What actually helps — muscle preservation, GI relief, nutrient gaps (no upsell).
Tired? Why most "energy" pills only work if they fix a deficit — and how to find yours first.
The right pick depends on your goals. Answer a few quick questions for a personalised recommendation — or dig into the full evidence on each.