Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Vitamin C wins 2 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Probably helps
4 of 6 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Likely helps
12 of 17 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both Hawthorn and Vitamin C have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
160-900mg extract (standardized to 2-3% flavonoids or 18-20% OPCs)
With meals, Split into 2-3 doses
Standardized extract (WS 1442 or LI 132 are most studied)
500-1000mg
With meals, Split doses if taking >500mg
Ascorbic acid or buffered vitamin C
8-12 weeks
6-12 weeks
Ongoing
1-2 weeks
4-8 weeks
With high doses (>2g)
Would integrated Western and traditional Chinese medicine have more benefits for stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Stroke and vascular neurology (2022) · Meta analysis · n=6339
Our results indicate that the combined use of CM and WM could be more efficacious in stroke rehabilitation compared with the use of WM therapy alone.
Hawthorn extract for treating chronic heart failure: meta-analysis of randomized trials
The American Journal of Medicine (2003) · Meta analysis · n=632
Eight trials including 632 patients with chronic heart failure (NYHA classes I to III) provided data suitable for meta-analysis.
Traditional Chinese medicines benefit to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Molecular biology reports (2012) · Meta analysis · n=25661
Comparing with western medicines mentioned above, TCM had a better effect on the normalization of alanine aminotransferase and disappearance of radiological steatosis in the treatment of NAFLD.
Vitamin C supplementation for prevention and treatment of pneumonia
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2020) · Meta analysis · n=2774
We are uncertain of the effect of vitamin C supplementation on mortality due to pneumonia (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.66; 1 study, 57 participants; very low-quality evidence).
Vitamin C supplementation in pregnancy
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2015) · Meta analysis · n=20038
Conversely, the risk of term PROM was increased when supplementation included vitamin C and vitamin E (average RR 1.73, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.23; 3060 participants; two studies; I² = 0%).
Enhanced Vitamin C Delivery: A Systematic Literature Review Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Alternative Supplement Forms in Healthy Adults
Nutrients (2025) · Systematic review
Most studies (77%) had a low risk of bias.
Based on meta-analysis showing 7-watt improvement in maximal workload. Effects primarily documented in mild heart failure patients. Most studies used WS 1442 extract standardized to 18.75% oligomeric procyanidins.
Based on 3 meta-analyses of sepsis patients. One study showed RR 0.60 for mortality reduction, but another showed increased risk (RR 1.21). Evidence quality rated as low to very low. Effect limited to intravenous administration in critically ill patients.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
Vitamin C has a higher evidence score (8/10 vs 6.5/10) and wins in 2 of 3 categories.
For reduce inflammation, Hawthorn has a higher relevance score (90 vs 65).
No known interactions between Hawthorn and Vitamin C have been documented in our database. However, always consult a healthcare provider before combining supplements.