Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Huperzine A wins 2 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Likely helps
4 of 5 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Mixed evidence
4 of 9 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both Huperzine A and St. John's Wort have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
50-200mcg twice daily
Morning and early afternoon, Avoid evening (may cause vivid dreams)
Huperzine A capsules (standardized extract)
300mg 3x daily (900mg total)
With meals, Divided into 2-3 doses
Standardized extract (0.3% hypericin)
2-4 weeks
30-60 minutes
2-4 weeks
During use
4-6 weeks
4-8 weeks
During use
First 1-2 weeks
The treatment of cognitive dysfunction in dementia: a multiple treatments meta-analysis
Psychopharmacology (2018) · Meta analysis · n=44854
The pooled standardized mean difference of the treatment effects on cognitive dysfunction was 0.439 (95% confidence interval 0.374, 0.504).
Traditional Chinese herbal medicine for vascular dementia
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2018) · Systematic review · n=3581
Two TCHMs (NaoMaiTai and TongXinLuo) had a 5% or more increased risk of AEs compared to the 'no Treatment' control, but the quality of this evidence was poor.
Interventions to delay functional decline in people with dementia: a systematic review of systematic reviews
BMJ open (2016) · Systematic review · n=289
The quality of the reviews varied; however most (65%) scored 8/11 or more on the AMSTAR tool, indicating high quality.
St John's wort for major depression
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008) · Meta analysis · n=5489
As effective as standard antidepressants for mild-moderate depression
Efficacy of Pharmacological Interventions in Milder Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Neuropsychopharmacology reports (2025) · Meta analysis · n=1049
A meta-analysis found no significant difference in response rates between the two treatments (risk ratio [RR] = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.78-1.18) or dropout rates (RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.62-1.88).
Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Plant Extracts on Cognitive Function and Quality of Life in Stroke Patients
Phytotherapy research : PTR (2025) · Meta analysis
John's Wort extract (SUCRA 71.2%) was the most effective in reducing NIHSS scores, Berberine (SUCRA 84.1%) was most effective in reducing mRS scores, and St.
Based on meta-analysis showing MMSE improvement (WMD: 2.27) in dementia populations. Evidence primarily from dementia patients, limited data in healthy individuals. Quality concerns noted in systematic reviews regarding study methodology.
Based on multiple meta-analyses (n>5000) showing efficacy comparable to SSRIs for mild-moderate depression. Effect plateau around 900-1200mg. Not effective for severe depression. Requires standardized extract (0.3% hypericin).
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
Huperzine A has a higher evidence score (6/10 vs 7.8/10) and wins in 2 of 3 categories.
No known interactions between Huperzine A and St. John's Wort have been documented in our database. However, always consult a healthcare provider before combining supplements.