Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Iron wins 3 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Likely helps
11 of 15 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Mostly mechanism / observational
Top outcomes
18-45mg elemental iron for deficiency (varies by severity)
On empty stomach if tolerated, Away from tea, coffee, dairy
Ferrous bisglycinate (gentle, well-absorbed) or iron protein succinylate
Prescription-only, clinician-directed. Subcutaneous 20 µg once daily within the hour before the first meal of the day, after a 10 µg starting dose for 14 days. DO NOT self-dose.
morning
Subcutaneous once-daily injection (Adlyxin / Lyxumia)
2-4 weeks
4-8 weeks
4-12 weeks
Weeks (24-week endpoints)
Per meal / weeks
Months
Median 25 months
Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2024) · Meta analysis · n=48971
There is probably little to no difference in maternal death (2 versus 4 events, RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.12 to 2.69; 3 trials, 14,060 women; moderate-certainty evidence).
The Prevalence of Anemia among Pregnant Women in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients (2024) · Meta analysis · n=722
The results showed that the prevalence of anemia, ID, and IDA among pregnant women in China were 30.7% (95% CI: 26.6%, 34.7%), 45.6% (95% CI: 37.0%, 54.2%), and 17.3% (95% CI: 13.9%, 20.7%), respectively.
Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2024) · Meta analysis · n=572
Intravenous iron versus oral iron supplementation The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of intravenous iron on mortality (risk ratio (RR) 2.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12 to 71.96; P = 0.51; I² = not applicable; 3 RCTs; 1 event; 572 women; very low-certainty evidence).
Lixisenatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome (ELIXA).
N Engl J Med (2015) · Rct · n=6068
Cardiovascular-outcomes RCT: 6,068 patients with type 2 diabetes and a recent acute coronary syndrome (MI or unstable angina within 180 days), lixisenatide vs placebo added to usual care, median 25 months
Efficacy and safety of the once-daily GLP-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide in monotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes (GetGoal-Mono).
Diabetes Care (2012) · Rct · n=361
Phase-3 double-blind 12-week RCT, 361 drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes randomized to lixisenatide (two titration regimens) or placebo
Adding once-daily lixisenatide for type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by established basal insulin: a 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison (GetGoal-L).
Diabetes Care (2013) · Rct · n=495
Phase-3 double-blind RCT, 495 patients on established basal insulin with inadequate control, add-on lixisenatide 20 µg vs placebo for 24 weeks
Based on meta-analyses showing hemoglobin improvements of 2.01-5.30 g/dL in iron deficient populations. Higher doses show diminishing returns with increased GI side effects. Effectiveness varies significantly by baseline iron status and form used.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
Iron has a higher evidence score (9/10 vs 5/10) and wins in 3 of 3 categories.
No known interactions between Iron and Lixisenatide have been documented in our database. However, always consult a healthcare provider before combining supplements.