Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Vitamin A wins 1 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Likely helps
18 of 23 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Mixed evidence
8 of 17 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both Selenium and Vitamin A have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
100-200mcg
With food
Selenomethionine (best absorbed)
2500-5000 IU daily (retinol); up to 25000 IU (beta-carotene)
With fat-containing meal, Any time of day
Mixed carotenoids or low-dose retinyl palmitate
4-8 weeks
4-8 weeks
2-4 weeks
2-4 weeks
4-8 weeks
With chronic excess
Selenium, antioxidants, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
The American journal of clinical nutrition (2020) · Meta analysis · n=9423
However, a decreased risk with antioxidant mixtures was seen for CVD mortality when selenium was part of the mix (RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.97; P = 0.02), with no association when selenium was absent.
Selenium for preventing cancer
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2018) · Meta analysis · n=27232
For analyses of RCTs with low risk of bias, the summary risk ratio (RR) for any cancer incidence was 1.01 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93 to 1.10; 3 studies, 19,475 participants; high-certainty evidence).
Selenium and prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
The American journal of clinical nutrition (2012) · Meta analysis · n=13254
Three high-quality studies included in the meta-analysis of toenail selenium and cancer risk indicated a reduction in prostate cancer risk (estimated RR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.61) with a toenail selenium concentration between 0.85 and 0.94 μg/g.
Effects of primary or secondary prevention with vitamin A supplementation on clinically important outcomes: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
BMJ open (2024) · Meta analysis · n=672
Vitamin A did not reduce mortality in individually randomised trials (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.05; I²=32%; p=0.19; 105 trials; moderate certainty), and this effect was not affected by the risk of bias.
Vitamin and Mineral Supplementation During Pregnancy on Maternal, Birth, Child Health and Development Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients (2020) · Meta analysis · n=451723
IFA supplementation showed notable improvement in maternal anemia and the reduction in low birthweight, whereas LNS supplementation had no apparent effect on outcomes; further research that compares LNS and MMN supplementation could help understand differences with these commodities.
Vitamin A supplements for reducing mother-to-child HIV transmission
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2017) · Meta analysis · n=6601
Antepartum or postpartum vitamin A supplementation, or both, probably has little or no effect on mother-to-child transmission of HIV in women living with HIV infection and not on antiretroviral drugs.
Based on Cochrane systematic review showing moderate-certainty evidence for TPO antibody reduction. Effects on thyroid hormone levels (TSH, T4, T3) were inconsistent across studies.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
Vitamin A has a higher evidence score (9/10 vs 9/10) and wins in 1 of 3 categories.
For healthy aging, Vitamin A has a higher relevance score (80 vs 65).
No known interactions between Selenium and Vitamin A have been documented in our database. However, always consult a healthcare provider before combining supplements.