Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we’ll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Smoking status: not checked. AREDS2 Formula: what these mean for you changes depending on whether you smoke or used to, and you have not told us. That check was skipped.
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
AREDS2 Formula vs Vitamin D3: Vitamin D3 has the stronger overall evidence (7.5 vs 7/10); the best pick depends on your goals. Take the 60-second quiz for a pick tailored to your goals.
Vitamin D3 wins 3 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Too few graded studies
Top outcomes
Verdict
Probably helps
7 of 14 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
One AREDS2 daily regimen, usually split into two servings: vitamin C 500 mg, vitamin E 400 IU, lutein 10 mg, zeaxanthin 2 mg, zinc 80 mg (as zinc oxide) and copper 2 mg (as cupric oxide)
With meals
A product matching the AREDS2 composition exactly: vitamin C 500 mg, vitamin E 400 IU, lutein 10 mg, zeaxanthin 2 mg, zinc 80 mg, copper 2 mg
2000-4000 IU daily
Morning with breakfast
D3 (cholecalciferol) softgel or liquid
and 3 more not shown
and 1 more not shown
Years — average follow-up was 6.3 years
Years
Long-term
Years
4-8 weeks
4-8 weeks
2-4 weeks
4-8 weeks
Lutein + zeaxanthin and omega-3 fatty acids for age-related macular degeneration: the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) randomized clinical trial.
JAMA (2013) · Rct · n=4203
Primary analysis was NULL: lutein/zeaxanthin HR 0.90 (98.7% CI 0.76-1.07, P=.12); DHA+EPA HR 0.97 (0.82-1.16, P=.70); both together HR 0.89 (0.75-1.06, P=.10)
A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report no. 8.
Arch Ophthalmol (2001) · Rct · n=3640
Antioxidants plus zinc vs placebo for advanced AMD: OR 0.72 (99% CI 0.52-0.98). Zinc alone OR 0.75 (0.55-1.03); antioxidants alone OR 0.80 (0.59-1.09) — neither significant on its own
Long-term Outcomes of Adding Lutein/Zeaxanthin and ω-3 Fatty Acids to the AREDS Supplements on Age-Related Macular Degeneration Progression: AREDS2 Report 28.
JAMA Ophthalmol (2022) · Cohort · n=3882
10-year lung cancer odds ratio: 1.82 (95% CI 1.06-3.12, P=.02) for beta-carotene assignment vs 1.15 (0.79-1.66, P=.46) for lutein/zeaxanthin
Vitamin D supplementation vs. placebo and incident type 2 diabetes in an ancillary study of the randomized Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial
Nature communications (2025) · Rct · n=22220
Ancillary analysis of VITAL: 22,220 adults without T2D randomized to vitamin D3 2000 IU/day or placebo, with a meta-analysis of 3 additional trials.
Vitamin D Supplementation for Patients with Dysmenorrhoea: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
Nutrients (2024) · Meta analysis · n=687
TSA revealed that the current RCTs provide sufficient information.
Vitamin D and respiratory tract infections
BMJ (2017) · Meta analysis · n=11321
25 RCTs, 11 321 participants aged 0 to 95 years. Vitamin D reduced acute respiratory tract infection overall (adjusted OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96).
Both points come from a meta-analysis of double-blind cholecalciferol trials in people aged 60 and over (PMID 15886381). Trials at 700 to 800 IU a day cut hip fracture risk by 26% (RR 0.74) and non-vertebral fractures by 23%, plotted at 800 IU. Trials at 400 IU a day showed no benefit (hip fracture RR 1.15), and the WHI trial of 400 IU with 1,000 mg calcium did not significantly reduce hip fracture (PMID 16481635). Most of these trials also gave calcium, and the Cochrane review found vitamin D alone unlikely to prevent fractures while vitamin D with calcium gave a small reduction (PMID 24729336). Doses above 800 IU were not compared, so no optimal dose or ceiling is set.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
Vitamin D3 has a higher evidence score (7.5/10 vs 7/10) and wins in 3 of 3 categories.
No documented interaction was found in the data searched. This does not establish that this exact combination is safe.
The honest tier list — proven staples vs situational vs mostly marketing. The hub the other guides feed into.
On Ozempic/Wegovy/Mounjaro? What actually helps — muscle preservation, GI relief, nutrient gaps (no upsell).
Tired? Why most "energy" pills only work if they fix a deficit — and how to find yours first.
Berberine, inositol, magnesium vs the cinnamon/chromium hype — and the med-interaction warning.
The right pick depends on your goals. Answer a few quick questions for a personalised recommendation — or dig into the full evidence on each.