Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
CoQ10 wins 2 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Likely helps
16 of 20 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Likely helps
12 of 13 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
100-300mg daily
With fatty meal
Ubiquinol (reduced form)
1g three times daily before meals (3g total)
30-60 minutes before meals, With 1-2 glasses of water, Before largest meals for weight loss
Capsules (safest)
4-12 weeks
8-12 weeks
4-8 weeks
2-8 weeks
30-60 minutes
4-8 weeks
4-8 weeks
If improperly taken
Efficacy and Safety of Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation in the Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) (2023) · Meta analysis · n=1021
Only one RCT reported adverse events, and they found that patients had no adverse effects or symptoms following supplementation.
Coenzyme Q10 for heart failure
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2021) · Meta analysis · n=1573
Coenzyme Q10 probably reduces the risk of all-cause mortality more than control (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95; 1 study, 420 participants; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 13.3; moderate-quality evidence).
Antioxidants for female subfertility
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2017) · Meta analysis · n=6510
This suggests that among subfertile women with an expected clinical pregnancy rate of 22%, the rate among women using antioxidants would be between 27% and 33%.
Effect of glucomannan on plasma lipid and glucose concentrations, body weight, and blood pressure: systematic review and meta-analysis
The American journal of clinical nutrition (2008) · Meta analysis · n=531
Glucomannan appears to beneficially affect total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, body weight, and FBG, but not HDL cholesterol or BP.
The Impact of Glucomannan, Inulin, and Psyllium Supplementation (Soloways(TM)) on Weight Loss in Adults with FTO, LEP, LEPR, and MC4R Polymorphisms: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Nutrients (2024) · Rct · n=112
The experimental group showed significant reductions in body weight (treatment difference: -4.9%; 95% CI: -6.9% to -2.9%; p < 0.01) and BMI (treatment difference: -1.4 kg/m2; 95% CI: -1.7 to -1.2; p < 0.01) compared to placebo.
Comparative effects of nutraceuticals on body weight in adults with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 111 randomized clinical trials
Pharmacological research (2023) · Meta analysis · n=6171
We conducted random-effects network meta-analysis with a Frequentist framework to estimate mean difference [MD] and 95% confidence interval [CI] of the effect of nutraceuticals on weight loss.
Based on heart failure meta-analysis (n=1573) showing mortality reduction. Effectiveness conservative due to single primary study (n=420). Take with food to reduce GI upset. Ubiquinol forms may have better absorption.
Meta-analysis of 6 RCTs (n=225) showed modest but significant weight reduction vs placebo. Effects appear greater in females. Limited long-term data available.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
CoQ10 has a higher evidence score (8/10 vs 6.5/10) and wins in 2 of 3 categories.
For boost daily energy, Glucomannan has a higher relevance score (80 vs 75).
No known interactions between CoQ10 and Glucomannan have been documented in our database. However, always consult a healthcare provider before combining supplements.