Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
CoQ10 wins 2 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Likely helps
16 of 20 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Probably helps
4 of 6 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both CoQ10 and Hawthorn have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
100-300mg daily
With fatty meal
Ubiquinol (reduced form)
160-900mg extract (standardized to 2-3% flavonoids or 18-20% OPCs)
With meals, Split into 2-3 doses
Standardized extract (WS 1442 or LI 132 are most studied)
4-12 weeks
8-12 weeks
4-8 weeks
2-8 weeks
8-12 weeks
6-12 weeks
Efficacy and Safety of Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation in the Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) (2023) · Meta analysis · n=1021
Only one RCT reported adverse events, and they found that patients had no adverse effects or symptoms following supplementation.
Coenzyme Q10 for heart failure
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2021) · Meta analysis · n=1573
Coenzyme Q10 probably reduces the risk of all-cause mortality more than control (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95; 1 study, 420 participants; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 13.3; moderate-quality evidence).
Antioxidants for female subfertility
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2017) · Meta analysis · n=6510
This suggests that among subfertile women with an expected clinical pregnancy rate of 22%, the rate among women using antioxidants would be between 27% and 33%.
Would integrated Western and traditional Chinese medicine have more benefits for stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Stroke and vascular neurology (2022) · Meta analysis · n=6339
Our results indicate that the combined use of CM and WM could be more efficacious in stroke rehabilitation compared with the use of WM therapy alone.
Hawthorn extract for treating chronic heart failure: meta-analysis of randomized trials
The American Journal of Medicine (2003) · Meta analysis · n=632
Eight trials including 632 patients with chronic heart failure (NYHA classes I to III) provided data suitable for meta-analysis.
Traditional Chinese medicines benefit to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Molecular biology reports (2012) · Meta analysis · n=25661
Comparing with western medicines mentioned above, TCM had a better effect on the normalization of alanine aminotransferase and disappearance of radiological steatosis in the treatment of NAFLD.
Based on heart failure meta-analysis (n=1573) showing mortality reduction. Effectiveness conservative due to single primary study (n=420). Take with food to reduce GI upset. Ubiquinol forms may have better absorption.
Based on meta-analysis showing 7-watt improvement in maximal workload. Effects primarily documented in mild heart failure patients. Most studies used WS 1442 extract standardized to 18.75% oligomeric procyanidins.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
CoQ10 has a higher evidence score (8/10 vs 6.5/10) and wins in 2 of 3 categories.
For support heart health, Hawthorn has a higher relevance score (92 vs 80).
No known interactions between CoQ10 and Hawthorn have been documented in our database. However, always consult a healthcare provider before combining supplements.