We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
CoQ10 wins 3 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Likely helps
16 of 20 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Mostly mechanism / observational
100-300mg daily
With fatty meal
Ubiquinol (reduced form)
300mg standardized extract twice daily (providing ~50mg aescin per dose; ~100mg aescin/day)
with-meals
Aescin-standardized, enteric-coated seed extract
4-12 weeks
8-12 weeks
4-8 weeks
2-8 weeks
2-12 weeks
2-8 weeks
Days
Efficacy and Safety of Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation in the Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) (2023) · Meta analysis · n=1021
Only one RCT reported adverse events, and they found that patients had no adverse effects or symptoms following supplementation.
Coenzyme Q10 for heart failure
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2021) · Meta analysis · n=1573
Coenzyme Q10 probably reduces the risk of all-cause mortality more than control (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95; 1 study, 420 participants; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 13.3; moderate-quality evidence).
Antioxidants for female subfertility
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2017) · Meta analysis · n=6510
This suggests that among subfertile women with an expected clinical pregnancy rate of 22%, the rate among women using antioxidants would be between 27% and 33%.
Horse chestnut seed extract for chronic venous insufficiency.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2012) · Meta analysis
Significantly reduced leg pain, edema, and itching vs placebo
Horse chestnut seed extract for chronic venous insufficiency.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2006) · Meta analysis
Reduced leg volume and ankle/calf circumference
Horse-chestnut seed extract for chronic venous insufficiency. A criteria-based systematic review.
Archives of dermatology (1998) · Systematic review
Most RCTs favored HCSE over placebo
Based on heart failure meta-analysis (n=1573) showing mortality reduction. Effectiveness conservative due to single primary study (n=420). Take with food to reduce GI upset. Ubiquinol forms may have better absorption.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
CoQ10 has a higher evidence score (8/10 vs 7/10) and wins in 3 of 3 categories.
For support heart health, CoQ10 has a higher relevance score (80 vs 58).
No known interactions between CoQ10 and Horse Chestnut have been documented in our database. However, always consult a healthcare provider before combining supplements.