Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we’ll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
CoQ10 vs Resistant Starch: CoQ10 has the stronger overall evidence (8 vs 6/10); they're alternatives for inflammation-related symptoms — the best pick depends on your goals. Take the 60-second quiz for a pick tailored to your goals.
CoQ10 wins 2 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Likely helps
9 of 10 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Likely helps
10 of 12 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both CoQ10 and Resistant Starch have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
100-300mg daily
With fatty meal
Ubiquinol (reduced form)
15-30g daily
With meals, Divide throughout day for higher doses
Raw potato starch (unmodified) or green banana flour
4-12 weeks
8-12 weeks
4-8 weeks
2-8 weeks
2-4 weeks
4-8 weeks
1-2 weeks
First 1-2 weeks
Efficacy and Safety of Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation in the Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) (2023) · Meta analysis · n=1021
Meta-analysis of 9 randomised trials with 1,021 women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Coenzyme Q10 for heart failure
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2021) · Meta analysis · n=1573
Coenzyme Q10 probably reduces the risk of all-cause mortality more than control (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95; 1 study, 420 participants; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 13.3; moderate-quality evidence).
Antioxidants for female subfertility
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2017) · Meta analysis · n=6510
This suggests that among subfertile women with an expected clinical pregnancy rate of 22%, the rate among women using antioxidants would be between 27% and 33%.
Metabolic Effects of Resistant Starch Type 2: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Nutrients (2019) · Meta analysis · n=670
However, these outcomes were heavily influenced by positive results from a small number of individual studies which contradicted the conclusions of the majority of trials.
Acute Effects of Dietary Fiber in Starchy Foods on Glycemic and Insulinemic Responses: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Crossover Trials
Nutrients (2023) · Systematic review
Data on insoluble DF and glucose metabolism are scarce.
The Effects of Resistant Starch on Biomarkers of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrition and cancer (2022) · Meta analysis · n=739
We used from the effect size, as estimated by the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) to perform the random method meta-analysis, with P value ≦0.05 as statistically significant.
CoQ10 has a higher evidence score (8/10 vs 6/10) and wins in 2 of 3 categories.
For inflammation-related symptoms, CoQ10 has a higher relevance score (75 vs 40).
No documented interaction was found in the data searched. This does not establish that this exact combination is safe.
The honest tier list — proven staples vs situational vs mostly marketing. The hub the other guides feed into.
Tired? Why most "energy" pills only work if they fix a deficit — and how to find yours first.
Magnesium, riboflavin, CoQ10 — the supplements with real migraine-prevention evidence (and doses).
CoQ10, zinc, selenium, carnitine modestly help sperm parameters — but live-birth evidence is weak.
The right pick depends on your goals. Answer a few quick questions for a personalised recommendation — or dig into the full evidence on each.