Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Resistant Starch wins 1 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Likely helps
16 of 20 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Likely helps
17 of 19 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both CoQ10 and Resistant Starch have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
100-300mg daily
With fatty meal
Ubiquinol (reduced form)
15-30g daily
With meals, Divide throughout day for higher doses
Raw potato starch (unmodified) or green banana flour
2-4 weeks
4-8 weeks
8-12 weeks
2-4 weeks
4-8 weeks
1-2 weeks
First 1-2 weeks
Efficacy and Safety of Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation in the Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) (2023) · Meta analysis · n=1021
Only one RCT reported adverse events, and they found that patients had no adverse effects or symptoms following supplementation.
Coenzyme Q10 for heart failure
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2021) · Meta analysis · n=1573
Coenzyme Q10 probably reduces the risk of all-cause mortality more than control (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95; 1 study, 420 participants; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 13.3; moderate-quality evidence).
Antioxidants for female subfertility
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2017) · Meta analysis · n=6510
This suggests that among subfertile women with an expected clinical pregnancy rate of 22%, the rate among women using antioxidants would be between 27% and 33%.
Metabolic Effects of Resistant Starch Type 2: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Nutrients (2019) · Meta analysis · n=670
However, these outcomes were heavily influenced by positive results from a small number of individual studies which contradicted the conclusions of the majority of trials.
Acute Effects of Dietary Fiber in Starchy Foods on Glycemic and Insulinemic Responses: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Crossover Trials
Nutrients (2023) · Systematic review
Data on insoluble DF and glucose metabolism are scarce.
The Effects of Resistant Starch on Biomarkers of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrition and cancer (2022) · Meta analysis · n=739
We used from the effect size, as estimated by the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) to perform the random method meta-analysis, with P value ≦0.05 as statistically significant.
Based on heart failure meta-analysis (n=1573) showing mortality reduction. Effectiveness conservative due to single primary study (n=420). Take with food to reduce GI upset. Ubiquinol forms may have better absorption.
Meta-analysis showed modest 3.32 mg/dL reduction in fasting glucose. Effects were heavily influenced by small number of positive studies, with majority showing mixed results. Higher doses increase GI side effects.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
Resistant Starch has a higher evidence score (9/10 vs 9/10) and wins in 1 of 3 categories.
For reduce inflammation, Resistant Starch has a higher relevance score (85 vs 55).
No known interactions between CoQ10 and Resistant Starch have been documented in our database. However, always consult a healthcare provider before combining supplements.