Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Curcumin wins 2 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Likely helps
8 of 10 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Likely helps
7 of 9 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both Curcumin and Green Tea Extract have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
500-1000mg daily (enhanced form)
With fatty meal
Enhanced absorption form: Longvida, Meriva, or BCM-95
250-500mg EGCG (or 500-1000mg green tea extract)
With meals, Morning or pre-exercise
Standardized extract (45-50% EGCG)
4-8 weeks
4-8 weeks
4-8 weeks
Immediate
Acute and 4-8 weeks
Acute
30-60 minutes
Comparative Effectiveness of Nutritional Supplements in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis
Nutrients (2025) · Meta analysis · n=4599
Bayesian rankings indicated Boswellia had the highest probability of being most effective for pain and stiffness, with krill oil and curcumin showing potential for function improvement.
Curcumin on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 103 Randomized Controlled Trials
Phytotherapy research : PTR (2024) · Meta analysis · n=7216
We meta-analyzed the effect sizes across eligible studies using the random-effects model.
Comparative efficacy and tolerability of nutraceuticals for depressive disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Psychological medicine (2025) · Meta analysis · n=17437
Adjunctive nutraceuticals consistently showed better efficacy than antidepressants (ADT) alone in outcomes including SMD, remission, and response.
Green tea (Camellia sinensis) for the prevention of cancer
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2020) · Meta analysis · n=1795
For incident prostate cancer, the summary risk ratio (RR) in the green tea-supplemented participants was 0.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 1.36), based on three studies and involving 201 participants (low-certainty evidence).
Impact of flavan-3-ols on blood pressure and endothelial function in diverse populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
European journal of preventive cardiology (2025) · Meta analysis · n=5205
Flavan-3-ol interventions included epicatechin, epigallocatechin-gallate, cocoa products, tea, grape extract, and apples delivering 586 mg (95% CI 510, 662) total flavan-3-ols.
The effects of green tea extract supplementation on body composition, obesity-related hormones and oxidative stress markers: a grade-assessed systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
The British journal of nutrition (2024) · Meta analysis · n=3802
Pooled effect sizes indicated that BM, BFP, BMI and MDA significantly reduced following GTE supplementation.
Based on meta-analyses of arthritis and osteoarthritis studies. Effectiveness varies significantly by curcumin form - enhanced bioavailability formulations may show greater effects at lower doses. Limited high-quality RCTs available.
Based on meta-analysis showing 9.29 mg/dl LDL reduction with 107-856 mg/d EGCG. Optimal cardiovascular benefits observed at 400-500 mg/day. Take with food to reduce GI side effects.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
Curcumin has a higher evidence score (9/10 vs 9/10) and wins in 2 of 3 categories.
For reduce inflammation, Curcumin has a higher relevance score (92 vs 85).
No known interactions between Curcumin and Green Tea Extract have been documented in our database. However, always consult a healthcare provider before combining supplements.