Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we’ll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Horse Chestnut vs Zinc: Zinc has the stronger overall evidence (8.5 vs 7/10); the best pick depends on your goals. Take the 60-second quiz for a pick tailored to your goals.
Zinc wins 3 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Too few graded studies
Top outcomes
Verdict
Likely helps
13 of 15 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
300mg standardized extract twice daily (providing ~50mg aescin per dose; ~100mg aescin/day). A typical label dose, no cited trial of oral horse chestnut states its dose.
With meals
Aescin-standardized, enteric-coated seed extract
15-25mg daily (a typical label dose, not the dose used in the cited trials, which used about 30 mg a day)
With meals
Zinc picolinate or zinc citrate
and 4 more not shown
2-12 weeks
2-8 weeks
Days
2-4 weeks
2-4 weeks
4-8 weeks
Immediate
Horse chestnut seed extract for chronic venous insufficiency.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2012) · Meta analysis
Significantly reduced leg pain, edema, and itching vs placebo
Horse-chestnut seed extract for chronic venous insufficiency. A criteria-based systematic review.
Archives of dermatology (1998) · Systematic review
Most RCTs favored HCSE over placebo
Aescin: microcirculatory activity. Effects of accessory components on clinical and microcirculatory efficacy.
Panminerva medica (2011) · Open label
Improved microcirculatory parameters
Efficacy of Zinc Supplementation in the Management of Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients (2024) · Meta analysis · n=739
Zinc supplementation significantly reduced pain severity compared to placebo (Hedges's g = -1.541; 95% CI: -2.268 to -0.814; p < 0.001), representing a clinically meaningful reduction in pain.
Effects of Daily Zinc Alone or in Combination with Other Nutrient Supplements on the Risk of Malaria Parasitaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
Nutrients (2023) · Meta analysis · n=1339
The effect sizes, represented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were standardised by transforming them into log RRs and then pooling them using a fixed-effects or random-effects model depending on the heterogeneity across studies.
Prevalence of Zinc Deficiency in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients (2022) · Meta analysis · n=806
Pooled analyses by the IBD subgroup showed a total population of 1677 with CD, for an overall mean zinc deficiency prevalence of 54% and 95% confidence intervals (CI) ranging from 0.51 to 0.56, versus 41% (95%CI 0.38-0.45) in the UC population (n = 806).
Zinc has a higher evidence score (8.5/10 vs 7/10) and wins in 3 of 3 categories.
No documented interaction was found in the data searched. This does not establish that this exact combination is safe.
AREDS2 works for diagnosed AMD; lutein/screen-strain claims are weaker. Who actually benefits.
The popular one (saw palmetto) mostly fails in rigorous trials; beta-sitosterol is the better bet.
Selenium helps; iodine can WORSEN Hashimoto’s. The honest take on "thyroid support".
CoQ10, zinc, selenium, carnitine modestly help sperm parameters — but live-birth evidence is weak.
The right pick depends on your goals. Answer a few quick questions for a personalised recommendation — or dig into the full evidence on each.