Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Omega-3 wins 1 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Probably helps
18 of 27 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Likely helps
12 of 15 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both Omega-3 and Pycnogenol have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
2-3g combined EPA+DHA daily
With meals containing fat
Triglyceride form fish oil
50-200mg
With meals
Pycnogenol brand (standardized to 65-75% procyanidins)
4-8 weeks
2-4 weeks
Immediate
4-12 weeks
4-8 weeks
4-8 weeks
6-12 weeks
Marine n-3 Fatty Acids and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer
The New England journal of medicine (2019) · Rct · n=25871
During a median follow-up of 5.3 years, a major cardiovascular event occurred in 386 participants in the n-3 group and in 419 in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.06; P=0.24).
Omega-3 fatty acids for intermittent claudication
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2024) · Meta analysis · n=1830
Omega-3 compared with a control may have little to no effect on ankle-brachial index (MD -0.02, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.04; 3 studies, 168 participants; very low-certainty evidence).
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the omega-3 fatty acids effects on brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)
Nutritional neuroscience (2024) · Meta analysis · n=587
The present systematic review and meta-analysis indicate the efficacy of omega-3 FAs in increasing the serum concentration of BDNF.
Phlebotonics for venous insufficiency
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2020) · Meta analysis · n=7690
Pooled data suggest that phlebotonics probably increase adverse events slightly, compared to placebo (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.27; 37 studies; 5789 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Pine bark (Pinus spp.) extract for treating chronic disorders
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2020) · Meta analysis · n=1641
In a mixed group of participants with type 1 and type 2 DM we do not know whether pine bark extract decreases HbA1c (MD -0.20 %, 95% CI -1.83 to 1.43; one study; 67 participants; very low-certainty evidence).
Effect of pycnogenol supplementation on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials
Phytotherapy research : PTR (2020) · Meta analysis · n=922
Pooled analysis suggested that pycnogenol supplementation can reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP) of (-3.22 mmHg; 95% CI [-5.52, -0.92]) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP; -1.91 mmHg; 95% CI [-3.64, -0.18]).
Based on multiple meta-analyses showing EPA-dominant formulas >1g/day most effective. Effects plateau around 2-2.5g. Adjunctive use with antidepressants shows better outcomes than monotherapy.
Based on meta-analyses showing modest reductions in systolic (-3.22 mmHg) and diastolic (-1.91 mmHg) blood pressure. Evidence quality varies across studies and effect sizes are relatively small.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
Omega-3 has a higher evidence score (9/10 vs 6/10) and wins in 1 of 3 categories.
For reduce inflammation, Omega-3 has a higher relevance score (90 vs 80).
No known interactions between Omega-3 and Pycnogenol have been documented in our database. However, always consult a healthcare provider before combining supplements.