Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Pine Bark Extract and Resveratrol are closely matched across evidence, studies, and safety.
Verdict
Likely helps
11 of 14 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Likely helps
9 of 11 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both Pine Bark Extract and Resveratrol have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
100-200mg daily
Morning with food, Can be divided into two doses
Pycnogenol (standardized extract)
150-500mg trans-resveratrol
With a meal containing fat
Trans-resveratrol capsules
4-8 weeks
6-12 weeks
4-8 weeks
Initial use
4-12 weeks
4-8 weeks
Phlebotonics for venous insufficiency
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2020) · Meta analysis · n=7690
Pooled data suggest that phlebotonics probably increase adverse events slightly, compared to placebo (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.27; 37 studies; 5789 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Pine bark (Pinus spp.) extract for treating chronic disorders
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2020) · Meta analysis · n=1641
In a mixed group of participants with type 1 and type 2 DM we do not know whether pine bark extract decreases HbA1c (MD -0.20 %, 95% CI -1.83 to 1.43; one study; 67 participants; very low-certainty evidence).
Effect of pycnogenol supplementation on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials
Phytotherapy research : PTR (2020) · Meta analysis · n=922
Pooled analysis suggested that pycnogenol supplementation can reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP) of (-3.22 mmHg; 95% CI [-5.52, -0.92]) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP; -1.91 mmHg; 95% CI [-3.64, -0.18]).
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Impact of Resveratrol Supplementation on Anthropometric Indices in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Phytotherapy research : PTR (2025) · Meta analysis · n=614
We determined overall effect sizes using a random-effects model and assessed heterogeneity using the I 2 statistic and Cochrane's Q test.
Resveratrol for the Management of Human Health: How Far Have We Come? A Systematic Review of Resveratrol Clinical Trials to Highlight Gaps and Opportunities
International journal of molecular sciences (2024) · Systematic review · n=200
Over the last 20 years, there have been almost 200 studies evaluating resveratrol across at least 24 indications, including cancer, menopause symptoms, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease.
Resveratrol and Female Fertility: A Systematic Review
International journal of molecular sciences (2024) · Systematic review
The current literature, though limited, suggests that resveratrol may play a role in female infertility.
Based on meta-analyses showing modest reductions in systolic (-3.22 mmHg) and diastolic (-1.91 mmHg) blood pressure. Effects are clinically small and studies show heterogeneity.
Based on meta-analysis showing TNF-α reduction in young and obese subjects. Effect sizes were modest and heterogeneity was high (I2=60-74%). Higher doses associated with increased GI upset risk.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
Both Pine Bark Extract and Resveratrol are closely matched — the best choice depends on your specific health goals.
For healthy aging, Resveratrol has a higher relevance score (75 vs 70).
No known interactions between Pine Bark Extract and Resveratrol have been documented in our database. However, always consult a healthcare provider before combining supplements.