Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we’ll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Pygeum vs Rye Pollen Extract: Pygeum has the stronger overall evidence (5.5 vs 4.8/10); they're alternatives for prostate health — the best pick depends on your goals. Take the 60-second quiz for a pick tailored to your goals.
Pygeum wins 2 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Mostly mechanism / observational
Top outcomes
Verdict
Too few graded studies
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (2)
Outcomes where both Pygeum and Rye Pollen Extract have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
75-100 mg standardized extract daily. The one cited trial that states a dose used 100 mg a day. Label products go up to 200 mg, above that dose.
Once or twice daily, With or without food
Standardized extract (13-14% sterols)
2 capsules/tablets three times daily (every 8 hours), or 375-750 mg twice daily
Three divided doses per day, roughly every 8 hours, With or without food — no trial specified a meal requirement
Cernilton / Cernitin standardized rye-grass pollen extract
6-8 weeks
6-8 weeks
8-12 weeks
12-24 weeks
12-24 weeks
6-12 weeks
6-12 weeks
What do we know about phytotherapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia?
Life sciences (2015) · Review
On the basis of preclinical studies several mechanisms of action have been postulated, including 5alpha-reductase inhibition, alpha-adrenergic antagonism, dihydrotestosterone and estrogen receptor inhibition.
Phytotherapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia. A minireview
Phytotherapy research : PTR (2014) · Review
Histological BPH, which typically develops after the age of 40 years, ranges in prevalence from >50% at 60 years to as high as 90% by 85 years of age.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia and male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)
BMJ clinical evidence (2011) · Systematic review
We found 63 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria.
Therapeutic efficacy of orally administered pollen for nonallergic diseases: An umbrella review.
Phytotherapy Research (2019) · Systematic review
Reviews support grass pollen extracts for symptomatic BPH and chronic prostatitis
A pollen extract (Cernilton) in patients with inflammatory chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a multicentre, randomised, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study
European Urology (2009) · Rct · n=139
139 men with NIH category IIIA CP/CPPS were randomised to pollen extract (n=70) or placebo (n=69), dosed as two capsules every 8 hours for 12 weeks.
A systematic review of Cernilton for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
BJU International (2000) · Systematic review · n=444
444 men were enrolled in two placebo-controlled and two comparative trials lasting 12-24 weeks; concealment of treatment allocation was unclear in all.
Pygeum has a higher evidence score (5.5/10 vs 4.8/10) and wins in 2 of 3 categories.
For prostate health, Pygeum has a higher relevance score (80 vs 78).
No documented interaction was found in the data searched. This does not establish that this exact combination is safe.
The right pick depends on your goals. Answer a few quick questions for a personalised recommendation — or dig into the full evidence on each.