Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Stinging Nettle Root wins 1 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Likely helps
3 of 3 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Likely helps
7 of 7 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both Pygeum and Stinging Nettle Root have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
100-200mg standardized extract daily
Once or twice daily, With or without food
Standardized extract (13-14% sterols)
300-600mg root extract
With meals, Split into 2-3 doses
Standardized root extract
6-8 weeks
6-8 weeks
8-12 weeks
4-8 weeks
4-8 weeks
What do we know about phytotherapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia?
Life sciences (2015) · Systematic review
On the basis of preclinical studies several mechanisms of action have been postulated, including 5alpha-reductase inhibition, alpha-adrenergic antagonism, dihydrotestosterone and estrogen receptor inhibition.
Phytotherapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia. A minireview
Phytotherapy research : PTR (2014) · Systematic review
Histological BPH, which typically develops after the age of 40 years, ranges in prevalence from >50% at 60 years to as high as 90% by 85 years of age.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia and male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)
BMJ clinical evidence (2011) · Systematic review
We found 63 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria.
The effect of nettle (Urtica dioica) supplementation on the glycemic control of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Phytotherapy research : PTR (2020) · Meta analysis · n=401
The results of the meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in FBS concentrations (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -18.01 mg/dl, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -30.04 to -5.97, p < .001, I2 = 94.6%) following nettle supplementation.
Dietary Plants for the Prevention and Management of Kidney Stones: Preclinical and Clinical Evidence and Molecular Mechanisms
International journal of molecular sciences (2018) · Meta analysis
The main underlying mechanisms of these dietary plants and their isolated phytonutrients in the management of urolithiasis include diuretic, antispasmodic, and antioxidant activity, as well as an inhibitory effect on crystallization, nucleation, and aggregation of crystals.
Plant food supplements with anti-inflammatory properties: a systematic review (II)
Critical reviews in food science and nutrition (2013) · Systematic review
The bibliographic search found no paper regarding the anti-inflammatory effects of Calendula officinalis L. and Symphytum officinalis L. by oral use.
Based on Cochrane review (n=1562) and network meta-analysis showing modest benefits. Evidence quality noted as low-to-moderate due to dated methodology in available RCTs. Most studies used standardized bark extract.
Based on multiple RCTs showing IPSS improvements in BPH patients. Most studies used combination formulations with saw palmetto. Effect magnitude conservative due to mixed study designs and combination treatments.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
Stinging Nettle Root has a higher evidence score (5.5/10 vs 5.5/10) and wins in 1 of 3 categories.
For healthy aging, Pygeum has a higher relevance score (85 vs 80).
No known interactions between Pygeum and Stinging Nettle Root have been documented in our database. However, always consult a healthcare provider before combining supplements.