Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Probiotics wins 1 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Likely helps
7 of 7 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Likely helps
30 of 39 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both Benfotiamine and Probiotics have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
150-600mg daily
With meals
Benfotiamine capsules
10-20 billion CFU
With or without food (strain-dependent), Same time daily for consistency
Capsules with multiple strains
4-12 weeks
8-12 weeks
2-4 weeks
4-8 weeks
4-8 weeks
First 1-2 weeks
Vitamin B and its derivatives for diabetic kidney disease
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2015) · Meta analysis · n=1354
There is an absence of evidence to recommend the use of vitamin B therapy alone or combination for delaying progression of DKD.
Effect of thiamine supplementation on glycaemic outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMJ open (2022) · Meta analysis · n=364
There was a significant increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (MD, 0.10; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.20) at 3-month follow-up.
Therapeutic potential of benfotiamine and its molecular targets
European review for medical and pharmacological sciences (2018) · Systematic review
The reduction in AGEs subsequently decreases metabolic stress which benefits vascular complications seen in diabetes.
Preventive Effect of Probiotics on Oral Mucositis Induced by Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
International journal of molecular sciences (2022) · Meta analysis · n=708
Three trials using Lactobacilli-based probiotics reported that the incidence of oral mucositis in the probiotic group was significantly low (risk ratio [RR] = 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.77−0.93, p = 0.0004).
Probiotics for treating acute infectious diarrhoea
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2020) · Meta analysis · n=12127
Effect size was similar in the sensitivity analysis and marked heterogeneity persisted.
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults and children
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2017) · Meta analysis · n=9955
A complete case analysis (i.e. participants who completed the study) among trials investigating CDAD (31 trials, 8672 participants) suggests that probiotics reduce the risk of CDAD by 60%.
Limited RCT data with mixed results. Meta-analysis found insufficient evidence to determine clear benefit. Conservative estimates based on subset of positive trials showing modest improvements in neuropathic symptoms.
Based on meta-analyses showing benefits for IBS and digestive symptoms. Effect sizes varied considerably between studies with low to very low certainty of evidence. Initial GI symptoms common when starting but typically resolve within 1-2 weeks.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
Probiotics has a higher evidence score (9/10 vs 5.5/10) and wins in 1 of 3 categories.
For reduce inflammation, Probiotics has a higher relevance score (95 vs 75).
No known interactions between Benfotiamine and Probiotics have been documented in our database. However, always consult a healthcare provider before combining supplements.