We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Caffeine wins 2 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Likely helps
22 of 25 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Likely helps
7 of 9 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both Caffeine and Green Tea Extract have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
100-200mg
Morning, 30-60 minutes before exercise
Pill/capsule for precise dosing
250-500mg EGCG (or 500-1000mg green tea extract)
With meals, Morning or pre-exercise
Standardized extract (45-50% EGCG)
15-45 minutes
30-60 minutes
30-60 minutes
30-60 minutes
Acute and 4-8 weeks
Acute
30-60 minutes
Effect of Acute Caffeine Intake on the Fat Oxidation Rate during Exercise: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients (2020) · Meta analysis · n=2020
A subsequent meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD).
The effects of caffeine intake on weight loss: a systematic review and dos-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Critical reviews in food science and nutrition (2019) · Meta analysis · n=606
Thirteen RCTs with 606 participants were included in the meta-analyses.
Effect of Caffeine and Nitrates Combination on Exercise Performance, Heart Rate and Oxygen Uptake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients (2024) · Meta analysis · n=95
The meta-analysis revealed that caffeine and nitrates supplementation (CAF+nitrates) did not enhance performance in time trials (TTs) over the CAF alone (g = -0.06; 95% CI = -0.46 to 0.35; p = 0.78) or nitrates alone (g = 0.29; 95% CI = -0.12 to 0.70; p = 0.17).
Green tea (Camellia sinensis) for the prevention of cancer
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2020) · Meta analysis · n=1795
For incident prostate cancer, the summary risk ratio (RR) in the green tea-supplemented participants was 0.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 1.36), based on three studies and involving 201 participants (low-certainty evidence).
Impact of flavan-3-ols on blood pressure and endothelial function in diverse populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
European journal of preventive cardiology (2025) · Meta analysis · n=5205
Flavan-3-ol interventions included epicatechin, epigallocatechin-gallate, cocoa products, tea, grape extract, and apples delivering 586 mg (95% CI 510, 662) total flavan-3-ols.
The effects of green tea extract supplementation on body composition, obesity-related hormones and oxidative stress markers: a grade-assessed systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
The British journal of nutrition (2024) · Meta analysis · n=3802
Pooled effect sizes indicated that BM, BFP, BMI and MDA significantly reduced following GTE supplementation.
Based on multiple meta-analyses showing 3-6mg/kg optimal dosing. Performance benefits plateau around 200-300mg with increased jitteriness at higher doses.
Based on meta-analysis showing 9.29 mg/dl LDL reduction with 107-856 mg/d EGCG. Optimal cardiovascular benefits observed at 400-500 mg/day. Take with food to reduce GI side effects.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
Caffeine has a higher evidence score (9.5/10 vs 9/10) and wins in 2 of 3 categories.
For boost daily energy, Caffeine has a higher relevance score (98 vs 58).
No known interactions between Caffeine and Green Tea Extract have been documented in our database. However, always consult a healthcare provider before combining supplements.