Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we’ll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Dutasteride vs Stinging Nettle Root: Stinging Nettle Root has the stronger overall evidence (5.5 vs 5.4/10); they're alternatives for prostate health — the best pick depends on your goals. Take the 60-second quiz for a pick tailored to your goals.
Stinging Nettle Root wins 2 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Too few graded studies
Top outcomes
Verdict
Likely helps
3 of 3 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both Dutasteride and Stinging Nettle Root have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
Approved BPH dose is 0.5 mg once daily; off-label hair-loss use mirrors the same 0.5 mg once-daily dose under a clinician. A prescription drug.
Any time of day
Oral soft-gel capsule (dutasteride 0.5 mg)
300-450 mg root extract a day (the cited trials used 450 mg of nettle root extract a day for 12 weeks, and 459 mg of dry root extract a day for 1 year). Label products go up to 600 mg, above the highest dose in the cited trials.
With meals, Split into 2-3 doses
Standardized root extract
and 1 more not shown
3–6 months
Months
Years
Weeks; may persist
4-8 weeks
4-8 weeks
The importance of dual 5alpha-reductase inhibition in the treatment of male pattern hair loss: results of a randomized placebo-controlled study of dutasteride versus finasteride.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (2006) · Rct · n=416
Randomized placebo-controlled trial of 416 men aged 21-45 comparing dutasteride 0.05, 0.1, 0.5 or 2.5 mg, finasteride 5 mg and placebo daily for 24 weeks
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dutasteride 0.5 mg once daily in male patients with male pattern hair loss: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (2010) · Rct · n=153
Phase-III randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of 153 men over 6 months
The effects of combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin on clinical outcomes in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: 4-year results from the CombAT study.
European urology (2010) · Rct · n=4844
CombAT: 4-year multicenter randomized double-blind trial in 4,844 men aged 50 or over with symptomatic BPH and prostatic enlargement, comparing tamsulosin 0.4 mg, dutasteride 0.5 mg or both daily, with no placebo arm
The effect of nettle (Urtica dioica) supplementation on the glycemic control of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Phytotherapy research : PTR (2020) · Meta analysis · n=401
Not the root indication. The evidence base for stinging nettle root (Urtica dioica) is BPH and lower urinary tract symptoms, and this study is about glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. The abstract does not state which part of the plant was used. Read it as species-level context, not as root evidence.
Dietary Plants for the Prevention and Management of Kidney Stones: Preclinical and Clinical Evidence and Molecular Mechanisms
International journal of molecular sciences (2018) · Review
Not the root indication. The evidence base for stinging nettle root (Urtica dioica) is BPH and lower urinary tract symptoms, and this study is about kidney-stone prevention. The paper describes a leaf/aerial preparation. Read it as species-level context, not as root evidence.
Plant food supplements with anti-inflammatory properties: a systematic review (II)
Critical reviews in food science and nutrition (2013) · Systematic review
Not the root indication. The evidence base for stinging nettle root (Urtica dioica) is BPH and lower urinary tract symptoms, and this study is about anti-inflammatory effects. The abstract does not state which part of the plant was used. Read it as species-level context, not as root evidence.
Stinging Nettle Root has a higher evidence score (5.5/10 vs 5.4/10) and wins in 2 of 3 categories.
For prostate health, Stinging Nettle Root has a higher relevance score (80 vs 75).
No documented interaction was found in the data searched. This does not establish that this exact combination is safe.
The right pick depends on your goals. Answer a few quick questions for a personalised recommendation — or dig into the full evidence on each.