Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Zinc wins 2 of 3 categories. Both are solid choices — the best pick depends on your specific goals.
Verdict
Likely helps
12 of 13 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Likely helps
21 of 26 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both Vitex and Zinc have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
20-40mg extract (standardized to 0.5% agnuside)
Morning, Consistently at same time daily
Standardized extract (0.5% agnuside or 0.6% aucubin)
15-30mg daily
With meals
Zinc picolinate or zinc citrate
1-3 cycles
2-3 cycles
1-2 cycles
2-4 weeks
2-4 weeks
4-8 weeks
Immediate
Vitex agnus-castus in premenstrual syndrome: A meta-analysis of double-blind randomised controlled trials
Complementary Therapies in Medicine (2019) · Meta analysis · n=1878
Vitex significantly reduced overall PMS symptom scores vs placebo
Herbal medicine for depression and anxiety: A systematic review with assessment of potential psycho-oncologic relevance
Phytotherapy research : PTR (2018) · Systematic review
Overall, 45% of studies reported positive findings with fewer adverse effects compared with conventional medications.
A Critical Approach to Evaluating Clinical Efficacy, Adverse Events and Drug Interactions of Herbal Remedies
Phytotherapy research : PTR (2016) · Review
A critical evaluation of the clinical data regarding the adverse effects has shown that herbal remedies are generally better tolerated than synthetic medications.
Efficacy of Zinc Supplementation in the Management of Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients (2024) · Meta analysis · n=739
Zinc supplementation significantly reduced pain severity compared to placebo (Hedges's g = -1.541; 95% CI: -2.268 to -0.814; p < 0.001), representing a clinically meaningful reduction in pain.
Effects of Daily Zinc Alone or in Combination with Other Nutrient Supplements on the Risk of Malaria Parasitaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
Nutrients (2023) · Meta analysis · n=1339
The effect sizes, represented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were standardised by transforming them into log RRs and then pooling them using a fixed-effects or random-effects model depending on the heterogeneity across studies.
Prevalence of Zinc Deficiency in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients (2022) · Meta analysis · n=806
Pooled analyses by the IBD subgroup showed a total population of 1677 with CD, for an overall mean zinc deficiency prevalence of 54% and 95% confidence intervals (CI) ranging from 0.51 to 0.56, versus 41% (95%CI 0.38-0.45) in the UC population (n = 806).
Based on meta-analysis of RCTs showing large effect size. Most effective for irritability, mood swings, and breast tenderness. Standardized extracts (Ze 440, BNO 1095) had strongest evidence. High heterogeneity noted between studies.
Based on meta-analyses showing reduced respiratory tract infections and improved immune markers (CD3/CD4). Effects primarily in deficient individuals. Take with food to reduce nausea risk.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
Zinc has a higher evidence score (8.5/10 vs 7/10) and wins in 2 of 3 categories.
For testosterone & cortisol balance, Vitex has a higher relevance score (92 vs 62).
No known interactions between Vitex and Zinc have been documented in our database. However, always consult a healthcare provider before combining supplements.