Loading…
We use essential cookies (authentication, your saved goals/stack) by default. With your permission we'll also enable privacy-respecting analytics (Vercel Web Analytics, anonymous load-time metrics) and error-replay diagnostics (Sentry — DOM snapshots only when an error fires) so we can fix bugs faster. Learn more about cookies
Head-to-head evidence comparison — which supplement is right for you?
Green Tea Extract and Vitex are closely matched across evidence, studies, and safety.
Verdict
Likely helps
8 of 10 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Verdict
Likely helps
12 of 13 studies with measurable effects showed benefit.
Top outcomes
Shared outcomes (1)
Outcomes where both Green Tea Extract and Vitex have evidence — compare verdict strength side-by-side.
250-500mg EGCG (or 500-1000mg green tea extract)
With meals, Morning or pre-exercise
Standardized extract (45-50% EGCG)
20-40mg extract (standardized to 0.5% agnuside)
Morning, Consistently at same time daily
Standardized extract (0.5% agnuside or 0.6% aucubin)
Acute and 4-8 weeks
Acute
30-60 minutes
1-3 cycles
2-3 cycles
1-2 cycles
Green tea (Camellia sinensis) for the prevention of cancer
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2020) · Meta analysis · n=1795
For incident prostate cancer, the summary risk ratio (RR) in the green tea-supplemented participants was 0.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 1.36), based on three studies and involving 201 participants (low-certainty evidence).
Impact of flavan-3-ols on blood pressure and endothelial function in diverse populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
European journal of preventive cardiology (2025) · Meta analysis · n=5205
Flavan-3-ol interventions included epicatechin, epigallocatechin-gallate, cocoa products, tea, grape extract, and apples delivering 586 mg (95% CI 510, 662) total flavan-3-ols.
The effects of green tea extract supplementation on body composition, obesity-related hormones and oxidative stress markers: a grade-assessed systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
The British journal of nutrition (2024) · Meta analysis · n=3802
Pooled effect sizes indicated that BM, BFP, BMI and MDA significantly reduced following GTE supplementation.
Vitex agnus-castus in premenstrual syndrome: A meta-analysis of double-blind randomised controlled trials
Complementary Therapies in Medicine (2019) · Meta analysis · n=1878
Vitex significantly reduced overall PMS symptom scores vs placebo
Herbal medicine for depression and anxiety: A systematic review with assessment of potential psycho-oncologic relevance
Phytotherapy research : PTR (2018) · Systematic review
Overall, 45% of studies reported positive findings with fewer adverse effects compared with conventional medications.
A Critical Approach to Evaluating Clinical Efficacy, Adverse Events and Drug Interactions of Herbal Remedies
Phytotherapy research : PTR (2016) · Review
A critical evaluation of the clinical data regarding the adverse effects has shown that herbal remedies are generally better tolerated than synthetic medications.
Based on meta-analysis showing 9.29 mg/dl LDL reduction with 107-856 mg/d EGCG. Optimal cardiovascular benefits observed at 400-500 mg/day. Take with food to reduce GI side effects.
Based on meta-analysis of RCTs showing large effect size. Most effective for irritability, mood swings, and breast tenderness. Standardized extracts (Ze 440, BNO 1095) had strongest evidence. High heterogeneity noted between studies.
AI-estimated from published studies. Interpret as directional guidance.
Both Green Tea Extract and Vitex are closely matched — the best choice depends on your specific health goals.
For estrogen & progesterone balance, Vitex has a higher relevance score (85 vs 70).
No known interactions between Green Tea Extract and Vitex have been documented in our database. However, always consult a healthcare provider before combining supplements.